There are many scenes of drug use, including cocaine and prescription abuse. Yes, there are shots of woman's genitals and bodies that are immodest. Yes, there is a shot where a man's genitals are briefly visible.
Yes, of course, this movie has very mature themes of sex, including scenes where the lead actor blows cocaine into a woman's anus.
Its combination of numerous sex scenes, coarse language, nudity, and graphic substance abuse make it a film that's best for adults only. It's laugh-out-loud funny at times, and hard to watch at others because of the graphic drug use and the overall pitifulness of the anti-role models' lives. The main character gags himself over a toilet bowl (we don't see anything) to purge his body before taking some intense drugs.Īgain, this movie was excellently written and directed. VIOLENCE: There is one scene in which a man punches another man and causes him to bleed and another character to vomit from seeing the blood. In addition, there is a countless number of on-screen breasts and buttocks, both male and female. That being said, one scene did involve a woman spreading her legs open to her husband, but the shot right before she covers herself with her hand is so exceedingly brief that nothing at all can really be seen, and it would be hard to say whether or not there actually is even an image of genitalia that could be seen in some kind of frame-by-frame playback. In other words, you didn't actually see any v*ginas, even when considering the very limited portion of the female genitalia that is visible on some women when they stand straight up. There was technically a lot of full-frontal female nudity, but in every scene featuring a naked woman's crotch, it was mostly obscured by her pubic hair, shadow, or her legs. Let me explain: One very brief scene did show a man's e*ect p*nis as he was m*sturbating in public, and this was graphic, but very quick.
There WAS some graphic nudity, in this sense, but what the film had a lot more of was nudity of the non-graphic nature. When I think "graphic," I think on-screen depictions of male or female genitalia. I'm not sure if "graphic" was the right word. NUDITY: I had also heard before going into this film that it was going to have a lot of "graphic" nudity. Some sex scenes are orgies others are one-on-one.
Characters are seen thrusting, moaning, and talking dirty in various states of undress. SEX: This film also stirred up a ton of controversy for its sex scenes, of which there are many. The main character snorts cocaine out of a prostitute's an*s and becomes partially paralyzed in an extended scene that involves him crawling back to his home after overdosing on expired Quaaludes. So graphic in fact that I felt a bit squirmy at times. There was also great usage of the words "c**ks**ker," "c**t," and "Godd**n."ĭRUGS: This movie had some really graphic scenes of drug use. I don't doubt it, but I wasn't really paying attention to the number. LANGUAGE: Apparently it set a record for the most number of "f**k"s spoken in film. I could go on about how great it was, but that's not really what this website is for.
He plays a professional thief who steals information from his targets by entering their subconscious. Our favourite on-screen DiCaprio watch, however, is the TAG Heuer Carrera Automatic that he wears in the sci-fi film Inception. Of course, the more prosaic reason is probably linked to the fact that DiCaprio is an IRL brand ambassador for TAG Heuer, which required the costume department to compromise with a watch that resembles a flashy Rolex, because Belfort is the kind of character who would surely have bought one. Perhaps that’s why he was so happy to hurl it into the crowd.
The watch in question is a TAG Heuer Professional 1000 series from the late 1980s, a perfectly nice watch that would set you back about $1,000 when it was first released. An early example of the Professional 1000 series.